Friday, December 17, 2010

Procure Proton Center Chicago Opens to Patients





This is a recent visit to a ProCure proton cancer center in Chicago area this week. Noah (KMI Marketing Director of Seoul Korea) Len Arzt (NAPT Director DC) and myself were given a tour by John Frick (ProCure Director) of this sophisticated proton facility. This center just recently opened up to patients ...last month. I am happy to see these new proton centers open up in the US. More centers are planned but development is in the years.

Awareness of proton therapy is my passion so that others may discover this wonderful treatment as an option for a cure for cancer. Proton therapy has very little side effects allowing patients to lead normal lives during and after treatment. Our objective of this visit was to create a synergy internationally with proton centers globally. Noah & I represent the National Cancer Center proton center in Seoul Korea. http://protonkorea.com/

You can find more information on proton cancer therapy treatment at http://www.proton-therapy.org/

I am happy to mentor to those that are interested. Email curtispoling@bellsouth.net

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Proton Therapy Continues to Provide Exceptional Results

I must take pause and announce that I am three years from my original diagnosis of prostate cancer I am happy to report my new PSA tests are at .80 nadir. What a joy to continue to report such great results from proton therapy. Three years ago I was Gleason 3+3+=6 staging T1c, PSA was at 5.8. My PSA had tripled in 8 months time so I had to move on the cancer and be aggressive in my approach.

I have had no side effects and that includes NO ED!


I am happy to continue to mentor many who have unfortunately have been diagnosed with cancer whatever the type. I know how anxious these times may be. Please continue to read my blog and consider the great attributes of living a life with so few side effects while treating the cancer.

For those who are uninsured or paying cash out of pocket for proton treatment please check out my new project at ProtonKorea.

Life is Good!

Thursday, September 16, 2010

11 percent had returned to their pre-surgery sexual function two years after prostatectomy

If you are considering prostate cancer surgery please review studies as this and explore my protstate cancer blog before making a decision. This study came across from Rueters...Read on:

Sex problems vex men long after prostate surgery

Sexual problems appear to be more distressful to men after prostate-removal surgery than urinary problems do, a new long-term follow-up study shows.

The findings suggest that while men may get used to incontinence and other urinary problems after surgery, sexual function is so important to them that adapting to a lower level of functioning is more difficult, Dr. Walter R. Parker and colleagues from the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor report.

All of the 434 men in the study had localized prostate cancer, meaning the disease had not spread beyond the prostate gland, and each underwent radical prostatectomy - complete removal of the gland. The approach is controversial when used to treat early-stage disease because of the impact the surgery can have on men's quality of life and the low risk that the disease will be fatal.

Because the men have such a high likelihood of survival, long-term quality of life becomes an important consideration. Parker and his team used a survey called the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC) designed to assess various aspects of quality of life after prostate cancer treatment and theirs is the first study to compare men's scores before the surgery and a full five years afterwards.

The results showed that urinary function and incontinence worsened soon after the surgery, but had improved by 12 months after the surgery, at which point 38 percent of the men had reached baseline levels of urinary function. This improvement remained stable up until four years after the surgery, and then declined.

In terms of "urinary bother"-meaning how bothersome men found their urinary symptoms-three-quarters of patients had returned to their baseline levels within a year of the surgery, while 21 percent actually showed a significant improvement in urinary bother four years after surgery.

Although men's sexual function continued improving for up to two years after the surgery, just 28 percent had returned to the level of sexual function they reported before the surgery at this point. And the level of sexual bother they reported didn't improve until 12 months after the surgery; at three years after the surgery, about 37 percent of men reported the same level of sexual trouble that they had before undergoing the surgery.

Among men who reported high levels of sexual function before the surgery, just 11 percent had returned to their pre-surgery sexual function two years after prostatectomy, compared to about 63 percent of the men with low sexual function.

The authors write that they were surprised by the mismatch between "bother" levels and recovery of function. Despite fewer than half of the men (38 percent) returning to preoperative urinary function levels at 12 months, for example, three quarters of them (74 percent) reported being back at their baseline distress levels over it -- suggesting they had become used to their new level of function.

With sexual function, the pattern was opposite. "Interestingly," they write, "the expected improvement in sexual bother scores over time as patients habituated to their decreased...function was not found."

While men in the study did not undergo a "structured and recorded recovery program" to restore sexual function after the surgery, Parker and his colleagues note, they were instructed to do Kegel exercises and offered prescriptions for drugs to restore erectile function.

But given the weak, slow improvement seen in men's sexual function in the current study, the researchers add, they have initiated a "structured early and long-term erectile rehabilitation program to augment sexual recovery as early as possible, yet also convince patients to maintain their erectile rehabilitation efforts long-term."

SOURCE: link.reuters.com/suq24p BJU International, online August 26, 2010.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Conventional prostate cancer treatments increase risk of blood clots by 250 percent

Here is a reason to take pause with traditional gold standard prostate cancer surgery:

A recent study published in The Lancet Oncology has found that men with prostate cancer are twice as likely as healthy men to suffer a blood clot, and those with the disease who undergo certain conventional treatments are at an even greater risk.

The study involved 76,000 Swedish men who were evaluated based on the number of cases of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism and arterial embolism that occurred. Participants on hormone therapy were twice as likely to suffer a pulmonary embolism and two-and-a-half times more likely to have DVT than those who did not receive the treatment.

Similar results were observed for those receiving curative prostate cancer treatments. Pulmonary embolism risk doubled as a result of the treatment while DVT risk increased by 173 percent.

Click here for the complete article.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Prostate cancer treatment sex truths played down

Many doctors play down the possible side effects of prostate cancer treatment on men's sex lives, for fear they'll be scared off, a world leader in the field has told an international conference on the Gold Coast.

"It's surprising to me how many men I see after radical prostate surgery who are unaware they will not ejaculate again," he said.

"There has been a bit of a tradition in the field of minimising the side effects and quoting only the best possible results, or talking about partial sexual function as thought it's full sexual function."

Director of the Sloan-Kettering centre's sexual and reproductive medicine program Dr John Mulhall says GPs have a responsibility to educate their patients.

If you have recently diagnosed with prostate cancer and researching your options please read my many resources on this blog. This is why I chose proton therapy to minimize side effects and continue a normal life. You have the same options too. Please feel free to drop me a note at Email Curtis I will answer your questions about this wonderful proton beam treatment for prostate cancer.

Credit for this story can be read here.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Brunswick man, cancer survivor to recruit patients for proton radiation treatment

Here is recent article published about my cancer journey:

When Curtis Poling found out he had prostate cancer, he momentarily considered doing nothing over the treatment options he was presented.

"It's devastating what it could do to a man," said Poling, who was 53 at the time.

"When (the surgeon) said I'd have to wear diapers for a year and the words 'leakage' and 'lose sexual function,' I was just sick."

The side effects of treating prostate cancer can be overwhelming. In addition to the effects of chemotherapy and surgery, radiation can cause urinary, bowel and erectile dysfunction.

Poling believes he found a better way.

Please read on here.

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

For those visiting this blog for the first time, I am re posting the start of my prostate cancer journey:

My PSA doubled from 2.9 in 8 months to 5.8 in 2007. Family doctor thought I should see an Urologist. No symptoms just getting up a couple of times at night in the last year. Besides my father didn't have prostate cancer until age 71 (successfully treated with seeds to date). I figured I had 20 more years not to worry.

Well the Urologist performed a digital on my prostate said it felt normal but slightly enlarged. He decided to test my PSA again but it shouldn't be anything to worry about. My PSA came back at over 5.0 so he decided to schedule a biopsy. They did the ultrasound and cored 12 samples out of me. The anxiety of the procedure was worse than the actual biopsy. No sweat! They said the ultrasound looked just like any 53-year-old prostate and looked normal from that point. I left the office feeling a little sore but somewhat relieved.

They called my wife the next day and said I had cancer and to see the Urologist the next day. It was a tough day for me, needless to say, thinking I was home free for now. Please read on.

My Blog List